SynthesisMedicine2026
Effect of flywheel resistance training on change of direction performance in team sports: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChange of direction (CoD) ability is a key determinant of performance in team sports. Flywheel resistance training (FRT) has been proposed as an effective modality to improve CoD performance due to its emphasis on eccentric overload. This system review evaluates the effectiveness of FRT in enhancing CoD performance among team sports athletes.
methodsWe followed PRISMA 2020. SPORTDiscus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through January 1, 2024 (Google Scholar screened for additional records). Eligible studies were randomized controlled or randomized crossover trials in team sport athletes, comparing FRT with non-flywheel comparators, with ≥4 weeks duration and at least 1 CoD outcome. Standardized mean differences (Hedges g) with 95% CIs were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity (I2). Egger's test for small-study effects was performed when k ≥ 10. Study quality was appraised with the National Institutes of Health tool.
resultsMeta-analysis revealed a significant enhancement in CoD performance following FRT compared to control interventions (effect size [ES] = -0.62). Notably, FRT exhibited greater efficacy among adult athletes (ES = -1.07; 95% CI = -1.51, -0.64) in contrast to those aged under 16 (ES = 0.16; 95% CI = -0.56, 0.89). Additionally, training frequencies of <2 sessions per week demonstrated a more substantial effect (ES = -1.18; 95% CI = -1.71, -0.64) compared to more frequent sessions (ES = -0.37; 95% CI = -0.93, 0.18). Moreover, extended training durations exceeding 8 weeks yielded superior outcomes (ES = -1.46; 95% CI = -2.04, -0.88) compared to shorter durations (ES = -0.44; 95% CI = -0.93, 0.04). Evaluation tests such as the T-test (ES = -2.10; 95% CI = -3.43, -0.77), Illinois agility test (ES = -1.19; 95% CI = -1.80, -0.57), and V-cut test (ES = -0.65; 95% CI = -0.96, -0.33) exhibited superior sensitivity in detecting CoD improvements over the shuttle run test (ES = -0.27; 95% CI = -0.82, 0.29).
conclusionFRT is an effective strategy for improving CoD performance in team sport athletes, particularly when implemented with lower frequency and longer duration. The observed benefits are likely attributed to enhanced eccentric strength, neuromuscular efficiency, and braking capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.