ArticleMedicine2026
Feasibility study on the effect and complications of intravenous therapy nursing intervention on patients with PICC catheterization.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has been widely used in clinical practice, but there are also high risks in the use process. With the development of intravenous therapy technology, it is possible to reduce PICC related adverse events. This study aims to explore the effect of specialized nursing intervention of intravenous therapy in patients with PICC and the feasibility of preventing/reducing complications. Subjects 23 to 75 years treated with PICC catheterization concluded. A total of 96 subjects were assigned to a control group (n = 48), which performed routine care, a study group (n = 48), which received 2-week intravenous therapy specialist nursing therapy based on routine care. After 2 weeks for PICC nursing therapy, Chi square test analyses showed significant differences between routine care (75.00%) and intravenous therapy specialist nursing therapy (93.75%) in treatment compliance rate, as well as the scores of Cancer Patients PICC Sell management and the core scale of quality of life of cancer patients. Significantly lower incidence of complications for study group (8.33%) versus control group (27.08%). Intravenous therapy specialist nursing intervention has a significant effect on patients with PICC catheterization, which can improve patients' treatment compliance, improve their quality of life, and effectively reduce the occurrence of related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.