ArticleMedicine2026
Comparative analysis of quality of life post coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery: A follow-up study on cardiac patients.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease is a major cause of mortality worldwide, particularly in developing countries. Treatments such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are common; however, their long-term effects on patient quality of life (QoL), particularly in developing nations, are not well understood. This study assessed and compared the QoL of cardiac patients 6 months after post-angioplasty and bypass surgery. A prospective cohort study was conducted over 5 months in 100 patients with Coronary artery disease who underwent PTCA or CABG at the Cardiology Follow-up Clinic of the same hospital. The data were collected using structured questionnaires. The result of this study shows baseline characteristics were similar between PTCA and CABG groups, except for a higher SYNTAX score in the CABG group (29.1 ± 8.6 vs 22.5 ± 7.4; P = .002). At 6 months, symptom relief was reported by 98% (PTCA) and 94% (CABG), with return-to-work rates of 94% and 88%, respectively. The rates of dyspnea, angina, and hospitalization were low and did not differ significantly between the groups. Both groups showed significant improvements in SF-36 and WHO-QoL Physical domain scores (P < .05). No deaths were recorded during follow-up period. Both PTCA and CABG significantly improved patients' QoL at 6 months, particularly in the physical health domain. While CABG showed slightly more consistent improvements in angina and dyspnea, this was not statistically significant during the short-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.