ArticleMedicine2026
Prevalence and clinical significance of proteinuria in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (IHCP) is the most common pregnancy-specific liver disease. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of proteinuria in patients with IHCP and to evaluate its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included pregnant patients with gestational age > 24 weeks who were diagnosed with IHCP and completed 24-hour urine protein collection at Haseki Training and Research Hospital (January 2018-December 2024). Proteinuria was defined as ≥300 mg/24-h urine collection. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: non-proteinuric, isolated proteinuria (proteinuria ≥ 300 mg/24 h in the absence of hypertension), and preeclampsia (defined according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG] criteria). The primary outcome was a composite adverse pregnancy outcome, including preterm delivery at <34 weeks, umbilical artery pH < 7.1, and emergency cesarean delivery due to fetal distress. Group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was performed adjusting for maternal age, twin gestation, and in vitro fertilization conception. Among 341 patients, 207 (60.7%) had no proteinuria, 105 (30.8%) had isolated proteinuria, and 29 (8.5%) had preeclampsia. Overall, 39.3% of IHCP patients demonstrated proteinuria. The distribution of IHCP severity, as classified by maximum total bile acid (TBA) concentration, was comparable among the 3 groups (P = .976). The demographic parameters were comparable between the groups. The preeclampsia group exhibited significantly higher composite adverse outcome rates (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that preeclampsia was independently associated with composite adverse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio: 6.96, 95% confidence interval: 2.69-18.01; P < .001), whereas isolated proteinuria showed no significant association (adjusted odds ratio: 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.95-2.50; P = .079). Approximately 39% of IHCP patients exhibited proteinuria. Isolated proteinuria without hypertension was not an independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In the absence of hypertension or other features of preeclampsia, the presence of proteinuria alone may not warrant escalation of care or accelerated delivery decisions in IHCP. However, prospective validation of these findings is needed before definitive clinical recommendations can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.