Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42065116›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Investigating the temporal dynamics and modeling of mid-level feature representations in humans.

Agnessa Karapetian, Alexander Lenders, Vanshika Bawa, Martin Pflaum, Raphael Leuner, Gemma Roig, Kshitij Dwivedi, Radoslaw M Cichy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Agnessa KarapetianDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-7187
Alexander LendersDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vanshika BawaFaculty of Biology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin PflaumFraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology ILT, Aachen, Germany.
Raphael LeunerDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gemma RoigDepartment of Computer Science, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-8076
Kshitij DwivediDepartment of Computer Science, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Radoslaw M CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-6071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual perception unfolds through a hierarchy of transformations, beginning with the extraction of low-level features, such as edges, and culminating in the representation of high-level features such as object categories. While the processing of low- and high-level features is well studied, the intermediate transformations, that is, mid-level features, remain poorly understood. Here, we introduce a stimulus set of naturalistic 3D-rendered images and videos with ground-truth annotations for five candidate mid-level features (reflectance, scene depth, world normals, lighting, and skeleton position) alongside for one low-level feature (edges) and for one high-level feature (action identity). To determine when these features are processed in the brain, we collected electroencephalography (EEG) responses during stimulus presentation and trained linearized encoding models to predict EEG responses from the annotations. We first showed that candidate mid-level features were best represented between ~100 and 250 ms post-stimulus, between low- and high-level features, and consistent with a bridging role linking sensory and semantic processing. We then assessed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as models of mid-level feature processing in humans and observed that although their hierarchies were shallower, they exhibited a comparable processing order for mid-level but not low- or high-level features, only for videos. Together, our results support the view that mid-level features are tied to surface- and shape-related processing and establish 3D-rendered stimuli with annotations as a valuable tool for investigating mid-level vision in biological and artificial neural networks.

Indexed as

CNNEEGencodingmid-level featuresscene processingvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID42065116
PMCPMC13125056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.