Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42065109›Full record

ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2025

A Novel Practical Session to Teach Concepts of Allometric Scaling of Brain Structures to Undergraduate Students Using Vertebrate Brains.

Christopher Cammies, Kelly Cavaciuti, Stephen H Montgomery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher CammiesSchool of Biological Sciences University of Bristol.
Kelly CavaciutiSchool of Biological Sciences University of Bristol.
Stephen H MontgomerySchool of Biological Sciences University of Bristol.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaling relationships are central to interpreting patterns of morphological variation in brain composition. However, allometric scaling can be a difficult concept for students to understand, requiring the integration of evolutionary biology with mathematical relationships. The differential scaling of brain components over evolutionary time is particularly complex. The challenges associated with these concepts are further compounded by the lack of practical activities to allow students to explore these concepts in a neuroscience context. In this study, we present a novel practical session to teach these ideas to second year biology and zoology undergraduate students by combining traditional sheep and pig brain dissections with accessible staining techniques, and imaging using freely available software, that together enable allometric scaling relationships among brain components to be visualised and analysed in both an intraspecific and interspecific manner. Objectively, our data shows a statistically significant improvement (p=<0.0001) in performance on questions related to the scaling concepts following the practical session. Subjectively, 93% of students wanted the lecturer to continue teaching this practical (with 0% of students against it being reused in future), with 89% believing the practical had increased their interest in studying neuroscience. Most students believed the practical had improved their understanding of the concepts and enhanced their ability to critically analyse literature on the topic of allometric scaling and brain anatomy. Students' perceptions of the practical were positive with the average rating of perceived learning 8.11 out of 10 (where 10 is an excellent learning experience and 1 is a terrible learning experience). Aside from minor technical suggestions, the main improvements suggested by students were that they wished they had more time for the practical.

Indexed as

allometric scalinganatomybrainscritical thinkinglab activityretina

Identifiers

PMID42065109
PMCPMC13127676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.