ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Riding toward inclusion: the journey of adapted cycling.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined how adapted cycles, as a form of assistive technology, support participation in sports and recreational activities for people with disability. Although physical activity is widely recognised for its benefits to physical health, psychological wellbeing, and social connectedness, people with disability continue to face significant barriers to meaningful inclusion in sport and recreation. Adapted cycles offer a means of addressing some of these barriers by enabling individuals to engage in cycling in ways that are responsive to their functional abilities and support needs. Methods: Using a qualitative research approach, this study drew on in-depth interviews with six participants, including children and adults, who had experience using adapted cycles across a range of contexts. This diversity allowed for a nuanced exploration of individual experiences. Data were analysed thematically to identify patterns related to engagement, perceived benefits, and factors influencing successful use. Results: Three key themes were identified: (1) navigating barriers and building pathways; (2) riding into wellbeing and inclusion; and (3) expanding horizons. Participants consistently reported improvements in physical health, including increased strength, endurance, and overall fitness. Many also described increased independence, noting that adapted cycles enabled them to access community spaces and engage in activities with reduced reliance on others. Importantly, these functional gains were valued for the ways in which they supported social inclusion. Participants described increased confidence and self efficacy, as well as a stronger sense of belonging when cycling with family members, friends, or within community groups. Discussion: Adapted cycles were perceived as facilitating social interaction, increasing visibility in public spaces, and challenging assumptions about disability and capability. The study also identified several contextual factors that shaped inclusive outcomes. These included access to customised and well-maintained equipment, quality assessment and selection services, accessible environments, and strong social support from peers, families, and organisations. Persistent barriers such as inaccessible transport and environments were noted to constrain inclusion opportunities. Overall, the findings contribute to broader discussions on inclusive recreation and assistive technology by demonstrating that the value of adapted cycling lies not in participation itself, but in its capacity to foster meaningful social inclusion and enhance wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.