ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Rule-based clinical decision support system for automated assessment of left ventricular diastolic function during stress echocardiography.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging to diagnose due to the complexity of diastolic function assessment during stress echocardiography, where multiple hemodynamic parameters must be evaluated under time pressure. Explainable artificial intelligence, specifically rule-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS), offers promising improvements in reproducibility and interpretability. Methods: A rule-based CDSS was developed and clinically validated to automate left ventricular diastolic function assessment during semi-supine bicycle stress echocardiography. A prospective cohort of 134 patients (mean age 61.3 ± 8.7 years) with exertional dyspnea and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF >50%) was enrolled, excluding individuals with significant valvular pathologies, arrhythmias, or unstable ischemia. Echocardiographic and Doppler data were collected using Toshiba Aplio500 and Esaote MyLabSIGMA systems. The algorithm incorporated manual input of measurements, computed derived indices (e.g., diastolic reserve index, myocardial stiffness, vascular resistance), and applied rule-based logic in accordance with ASE/EACVI (2016/2022) guidelines and the ESC HFpEF consensus. Results: The CDSS generated diagnostic conclusions within 3 min per case, matching expert assessments in 93% of cases and correctly identifying stress-induced diastolic dysfunction in 85%. It demonstrated high diagnostic agreement (ICC > 0.94) and discrimination (AUC = 0.92). Rule-based outputs, such as "Impaired diastolic reserve" or "Right ventricular dysfunction under load," were based on combinations of parameters (e.g., E/e' > 15, Δe' ≤ 0, TAPSE < 17 mm, PCWR > 12 mmHg). Conclusion: The explainable, guideline-compliant CDSS enables real-time, transparent analysis of diastolic function, supporting improved diagnostic consistency and augmented physician decision-making in cardiovascular care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.