Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064933›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Transitions in ENDS and cigarette use among youth in the PATH Study from 2015-2023: a multistate transition modeling analysis.

Olivia K Roberts, Jihyoun Jeon, Evelyn Jimenez-Mendoza, Stephanie R Land, Neal D Freedman, Rossana Torres-Alvarez, Ritesh Mistry, David T Levy, Rafael Meza, Andrew F Brouwer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olivia K RobertsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-1582-2174
Jihyoun JeonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-3412
Evelyn Jimenez-MendozaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-2520
Stephanie R LandTobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-1437
Neal D FreedmanTobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0074-1098
Rossana Torres-AlvarezDepartment of Population Health Sciences, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ritesh MistryDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
David T LevyDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-5037
Andrew F BrouwerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3779-5287

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Mendez Emilien · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Monitoring trends in transitions in the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and cigarettes among youth is important for understanding the potential public health impacts of these products. Methods: Using a weighted Markov multistate transition model accounting for complex survey design, we estimated transition rates and one-year transition probabilities between never, non-current, ENDS-only, and cigarette use (with or without dual use of ENDS) among 26,744 youth aged 12-17 years who participated in at least two consecutive waves from Waves 2-7.5 (approximately 2015-2023) of the nationally representative Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. We also estimated transitions stratified by ages 12-14 and 15-17 years. Results: The one-year probability of ENDS-only initiation from never use among youth peaked in 2017-19 (Waves 4-5) at 4.0% (95%CI: 3.6-4.3%) and was higher for 15-17-year-olds at 5.8% (95%CI: 5.2-6.4%) than 12-14-year-olds at 2.2% (95%CI: 1.8-2.6%). In the following years, ENDS-only initiation rates declined and plateaued, with 2.6% (95%CI: 2.3-3.0%) initiation in 2022-23. Cigarette initiation from never use decreased over 2015-23 from 0.8% (95%CI: 0.6-1.0%) in 2015-16 to 0.1% (95%CI: 0.0-0.2%) in 2022-23. There was an increase in the fraction of youth who transitioned from non-current product use to ENDS-only use from 13.7% (95%CI: 7.5-20.0%) in 2015-16 to 35.1% (95%CI: 25.4-44.8%) in 2022-23, paired with a decrease in non-current use to cigarette use from 20.9% (95%CI: 11.8-30.0%) to 6.3% (95%CI: 1.7-10.8%). Transitions from ENDS-only or cigarette use to non-current use remained relatively constant over time at around 25% and 15% per year, respectively. Conclusion: ENDS-only use initiation has changed over time, peaking around 2019 and subsequently decreasing and plateauing, but cessation rates for both ENDS and cigarettes have remained relatively stable. Thus, interruption of tobacco product initiation may be the most effective approach to reducing tobacco product use among youth.

Indexed as

cigarettedual useelectronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS)multistate transition modeltobaccotransitionyouth

Identifiers

PMID42064933
PMCPMC13127515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.