Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064919›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Engaging patient communities in intracranial neuroscience research.

Ashley Walton, Erika Versalovic, Amanda R Merner, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Alan Bush, R Mark Richardson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashley WaltonMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1840-8373
Erika VersalovicMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5354-7777
Amanda R MernerMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-170X
Gabriel Lázaro-MuñozMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1933-9453
Alan BushMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0407-5750
R Mark RichardsonMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2620-7387

Funding

Cortical-Basal Ganglia Speech NetworksU01NS117836 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RICHARDSON, ROBERT MARK · 2020 to 2024
$5.8M
Post-trial Access, Clinical Care, Psychosocial Support, and Scientific Progress in Experimental Deep Brain Stimulation ResearchR01MH133657 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Joseph J. Fins, Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133657NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS117836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients who participate in intracranial neuroscience research make invaluable contributions to our understanding of the brain, accelerating the development of neurotechnological interventions. Engagement of patients as part of this research presents unique challenges, where study goals can be distant from immediate clinical applications and require specialized domain knowledge. Yet methods for meaningfully integrating patient communities as part of these research efforts is essential, as intracranial neuroscience guides the application of artificial intelligence for understanding and enhancing human cognition. In order to identify what patients consider meaningful research engagement we interviewed individuals who participated in a study during their Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery and attended a group event where they interacted with our research team. Analysis of semi-structured interviews identified four main themes: interest in science and the future of clinical care, contributing to science to improve lives, connecting with others, and accessibility considerations. Based on these insights, we propose strategies for transformational participation of patient communities in intracranial neuroscience research with respect to engagement objectives, communication and scope. This approach offers a foundation for sustaining relationships between scientists and communities rooted in trust and transparency, to ensure that impacts of neurotechnology on human health and cognition are aligned with patient needs as well as desired public values.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecommunity engagementintracranial neuroscienceneuroethicsneurotechnologyparticipatory research

Identifiers

PMID42064919
PMCPMC13127494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.