Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Protocol for the process evaluation of a mobile produce market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in lower-income communities: the Veggie Van Study.

Christina Kasprzak, Andy Canizares, Anne Lally, Leah N Vermont, Laurene Tumiel-Berhalter, Samina Raja, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Alice Ammerman, Lucia A Leone

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04246593 (Effectiveness and Implementation of a Research Tested Mobile Produce Market Designed to Improve Diet in Underserved Communities), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04246593 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness and Implementation of a Research Tested Mobile Produce Market Designed to Improve Diet in Underserved Communities

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity at BuffaloRan2020 to 2023Enrolled759ConditionsFruit and Vegetable ConsumptionArmsMobile Market program implementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina KasprzakDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Andy CanizaresDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Anne LallyDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Leah N VermontDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Laurene Tumiel-BerhalterDepartment of Family Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NC, United States.
Samina RajaDepartment of Urban and Regional Planning, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NC, United States.
Lindsey Haynes-MaslowDepartment of Health Policy and Management, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Alice AmmermanDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel, Hill, NC, United States.
Lucia A LeoneDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Funding

Effectiveness and Implementation of a Research Tested Mobile Produce Market Designed to Improve Diet in Underserved CommunitiesR37CA215232 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LEONE, LUCIA A · 2018 to 2024
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA215232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mobile produce markets have become increasingly prevalent throughout the United States, highlighting the need for evidence-based models for markets to follow. The Veggie Van (VV) model is a set of practices that have been found to be efficacious in increasing fruit and vegetable intake in underserved communities. The next step in determining the model's effectiveness is evaluating the model when implemented on a broader scale under real-world conditions. As part of a multi-state randomized controlled effectiveness trial, the Veggie Van Study, an extensive process evaluation of the implementation of the VV model was conducted. Methods: Nine partner organizations agreed to implement the VV model at newly launched mobile markets over a 12-month period. Organizations received funding, training, and technical assistance to support implementation of the model. In addition to facilitating participant recruitment and data collection, partners agreed to participate in implementation-related data collection. Data collection methods include quantitative process measures surveys, qualitative interviews, and mobile market sales data. The main process outcomes are fidelity, dose delivered, penetration, maintenance of the VV model, and contextual factors related to implementation. Discussion: This extensive mixed-methods process evaluation addresses a gap in the literature for transparent reporting of process evaluations; it also provides a model for similar community-based interventions to follow. Understanding the implementation process and the context surrounding implementation of the VV model is critical for interpreting effectiveness findings (i.e., dietary changes) and optimizing the intervention. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04246593, NCT04246593.

Indexed as

Food MarketsFruitHealth PromotionPovertyVegetablesClinical Trials as TopicHumansUnited Statescommunity-based interventionimplementation evaluationlower-incomemobile marketprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42064881
PMCPMC13126556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.