ArticleThe East African health research journal2025
Reliability and Intra Urban Variability of a Quality of Life Index: Findings of Pilot Studies of Young Women in Kampala, Uganda.
Article in The East African health research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research on health and quality of life among young adults living in the slums is relatively sparse. This analysis aimed to: 1) assess the reliability of the Uganda Youth Quality of Life (QOL) Index across two pilot studies, and 2) examine intra-urban differences in QOL domains among young women in three slum communities of Kampala. Methods: Data from two consecutive pilot studies conducted among young women and girls in Kampala, Uganda were utilized for this analysis (n=60). These pilot studies were originally designed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of daily diaries and wearable devices for the larger cohort study ("TOPOWA", meaning empowerment). The QOL domains (living conditions and lifestyle, social relationships, and personal independence) were obtained from the Uganda Youth Quality of Life Index (part of baseline survey). Comparisons in QOL domains between the two pilots were conducted to examine reliability, and inter-urban differences were analyzed across the three study sites (Banda, Bwaise, and Makindye). Results: The mean age of all participants was 20.1 years, and nearly one-third reported having children. While the QOL index demonstrated reliability across pilots (no significant differences in domain scores or life satisfaction, p=0.59), significant intra-urban differences were found. Participants in Bwaise reported consistently higher satisfaction across multiple domains compared to Banda and Makindye. However, satisfaction with their current dwelling was highest in Makindye (F=4.7, Conclusions: The Uganda Youth Quality of Life Index was reliable across the two pilot studies. However, intra-urban differences were noted across Kampala, suggesting that urban slum communities have a high degree of variability in life satisfaction and may warrant targeted interventions which address community differences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.