Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064695›Full record

ArticleThe East African health research journal2025

From MDGs experience to SDGs Actions: Insights from Tanzanian Nurses and Midwives.

Peter Taratara, Elaine Bennett, Selma Alliex

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The East African health research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter TarataraJarrah Patient Assessment and Recovery Centre (PARC), Wodonga, Victoria, Australia.
Elaine BennettPerth Campus, Murdoch University, Australia.
Selma AlliexThe University of Notre Dame, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurses and midwives constitute the largest proportion of the health workforce and play a central role in achieving maternal and child health outcomes. During the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) era, particularly MDGs 4 and 5, their engagement was considered essential. However, anecdotal evidence from low- and middle-income countries suggests that nurses and midwives were insufficiently involved in MDG-related planning and decision-making. This study explored the enabling and inhibiting factors influencing Tanzanian nurses' and midwives' participation in the implementation of MDGs 4 and 5, with the aim of identifying lessons to strengthen engagement during the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) era. Methods: A descriptive, holistic case study design was employed. Data were collected in 2017 from five hospitals in Tanzania (three public and two private) using surveys, focus group discussions, and semi-structured interviews. Participants included 66 clinical nurses and midwives and eight nursing and midwifery administrators. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data were analyzed using inductive content analysis to identify key themes related to awareness, participation, enablers, inhibitors, and future engagement. Results: Most participants reported awareness of the MDGs, primarily through mass media, workplace meetings, and colleagues. However, awareness was uneven across facilities, with notable gaps in some hospitals. Nurses' and midwives' participation in MDGs 4 and 5 was largely limited to routine clinical activities, such as patient education and record-keeping, rather than involvement in planning or decision-making processes. Major enablers included their professional knowledge, numerical dominance in the workforce, and close proximity to patients. Key barriers included heavy workloads, limited time, inadequate representation in policy forums, insufficient empowerment, and organizational and resource constraints. Despite these challenges, participants expressed strong willingness to engage more actively in future global health initiatives. Conclusion: Nurses and midwives in Tanzania played a largely indirect and constrained role in the implementation of MDGs 4 and 5, with participation primarily embedded in routine clinical practice rather than strategic decision-making. Strengthening leadership support, improving access to information, enhancing professional empowerment, and increasing involvement in policy and planning processes are critical to maximizing nurses' and midwives' contributions to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 3 and future global health agendas.

Identifiers

PMID42064695
PMCPMC13126571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.