ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2026
BrainInsights: a comprehensive framework for pre-processing, analysis, and interpretation of neuroimaging data using traditional statistics and machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NeuroFAIR curator: an AI-assisted framework for metadata enrichment, quality screening, curation prioritization, and FAIR readiness of brain tumor MRI data.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroimaging presents us with an in-depth understanding about brain structure and function, yet the data complexity poses significant analytical challenges. Current frameworks suffer from issues such as scalability, poor integration with traditional statistics and a need for a programing background, which hinder researchers from focusing on neuroscience questions. To address these limitations, we present BrainInsights, an integrated and automated GUI-based pipeline ecosystem designed to facilitate the analysis of multi-modal or multi-parametric neuroimaging data in a flexible way. The framework comprises three core tools: MARIA (MAgnetic Resonance Imaging data Analysis and inspection tool) for data inspection and hypotheses testing, ML Pipeline for automated feature selection and model construction, and ML DaViz for model evaluation and bio-signature generation. Deployed as a singularity container, the system ensures reproducibility and scalability across computing environments. We validated BrainInsights using diverse datasets, including multi-parametric MRI studies of Anorexia Nervosa, Crohn's disease, and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Specifically, the framework distinguished young Anorexia Nervosa patients from controls with a balanced accuracy of 65%, while in the PreCePRA trial, it predicted Rheumatoid Arthritis treatment response with a balanced accuracy of up to 95.4% using functional pain markers. The results demonstrate the ability of the framework to achieve high separation of subgroups and treatment success and additionally bridge hypotheses-driven statistical analysis with data-driven machine learning analysis. By enabling interpretability tools like SHAP, BrainInsights empowers researchers to move beyond "black-box" modeling to uncover stable, biologically plausible bio-signatures. Ultimately, this framework aids in accelerating the translation of complex neuroimaging data into meaningful clinical insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.