Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064618›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026

Acute atrial fibrillation and flutter treated electively: rationale and design of the randomized controlled AFFELECT trial.

Jani Rankinen, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Juuso Järventie, Markus Hautamäki, Anna Numminen, Matilda Hurskainen, Markku Rantanen, Antti Muuronen, Juho Tynkkynen, Jussi Hernesniemi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04267159 (Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated Electively - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on the Safety of Elective Management of Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04267159 narecruitingnot on this map

Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated Electively - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on the Safety of Elective Management of Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter

TypeinterventionalSponsorTampere UniversityRan2020 to 2029Enrolled500ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation, Atrial FlutterArmsAcute cardioversion, Delayed cardioversion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jani RankinenTampere Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 1, 33520 Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5796-6557
Leo-Pekka LyytikäinenTampere Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 1, 33520 Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7200-5455
Juuso JärventieTampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Markus HautamäkiFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology and Finnish Cardiovascular Research Center, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Anna NumminenTampere Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 1, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Matilda HurskainenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology and Finnish Cardiovascular Research Center, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Markku RantanenTampere Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 1, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Antti MuuronenTampere Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 1, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Juho TynkkynenCentre for Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Jussi HernesniemiTampere Heart Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 1, 33520 Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Cardioversion (CV) is commonly used in the emergency department (ED) to treat recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL). Design: The AFFELECT trial (NCT04267159) is an investigator-initiated, prospective, unblinded randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing experimental delayed rhythm control (elective CV performed within 5-9 days after the index visit) to standard acute rhythm control (CV performed in ED) in patients with recent-onset (duration <48 h) symptomatic AF/AFL suitable for rhythm control. A total of 500 patients are randomized in a 2:3 ratio to the acute and delayed groups, respectively, accounting for a possible one-third unplanned early CV rate in the delayed group due to higher symptom burden. Unplanned early CV means that patients with unbearable symptoms are offered the option for an earlier CV (before the 5-9 days target timeline) if needed. Patients randomized to delayed group are discharged immediately after adequate heart rate control (heart rate <110 bpm) and anticoagulation and are scheduled an appointment for delayed CV at a cardiology outpatient clinic (in transoesophageal echocardiography guidance if required). Patients randomized to acute CV undergo cardioversion in the ED within 48 h of arrhythmia onset and are assigned to a cardiologic outpatient clinic visit also within 5-9 days. The primary end-point is the presence of sinus rhythm on electrocardiogram at 4 weeks after the outpatient clinic visit. Conclusion: The AFFELECT trial tests whether delayed management of recent-onset AF/AFL is a non-inferior alternative to acute CV, aiming to reduce ED burden, number of needed CVs, and redirect care to specialized arrhythmia units.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationAtrial flutterCardioversionRhythm control

Identifiers

PMID42064618
PMCPMC13127653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.