ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026
Acute atrial fibrillation and flutter treated electively: rationale and design of the randomized controlled AFFELECT trial.
Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04267159 (Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated Electively - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on the Safety of Elective Management of Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Treated Electively - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on the Safety of Elective Management of Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Cardioversion (CV) is commonly used in the emergency department (ED) to treat recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL). Design: The AFFELECT trial (NCT04267159) is an investigator-initiated, prospective, unblinded randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing experimental delayed rhythm control (elective CV performed within 5-9 days after the index visit) to standard acute rhythm control (CV performed in ED) in patients with recent-onset (duration <48 h) symptomatic AF/AFL suitable for rhythm control. A total of 500 patients are randomized in a 2:3 ratio to the acute and delayed groups, respectively, accounting for a possible one-third unplanned early CV rate in the delayed group due to higher symptom burden. Unplanned early CV means that patients with unbearable symptoms are offered the option for an earlier CV (before the 5-9 days target timeline) if needed. Patients randomized to delayed group are discharged immediately after adequate heart rate control (heart rate <110 bpm) and anticoagulation and are scheduled an appointment for delayed CV at a cardiology outpatient clinic (in transoesophageal echocardiography guidance if required). Patients randomized to acute CV undergo cardioversion in the ED within 48 h of arrhythmia onset and are assigned to a cardiologic outpatient clinic visit also within 5-9 days. The primary end-point is the presence of sinus rhythm on electrocardiogram at 4 weeks after the outpatient clinic visit. Conclusion: The AFFELECT trial tests whether delayed management of recent-onset AF/AFL is a non-inferior alternative to acute CV, aiming to reduce ED burden, number of needed CVs, and redirect care to specialized arrhythmia units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.