ArticleNeurobiology of stress2026
Brain network centrality following stress in adults with major depressive disorder and childhood trauma.
Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Childhood trauma (CT) is a major risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD), potentially via altered stress system development. Previous studies have shown stress-related changes in brain network function in clinical populations, but evidence in MDD with CT remains scarce. This study examined changes in functional brain networks in adults with MDD and CT during acute and delayed phases following stress. Methods: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was acquired during acute (15 min) and delayed (135 min) stress phases following the Trier Social Stress Test in 66 adults with MDD and CT and 33 controls. Voxel-wise eigenvector centrality (EC) mapping quantified the network importance of eight functional brain networks. Subjective stress and affect were measured using visual analog scales. Results: Both groups showed significant subjective stress responses, with greater increases in tension in the MDD + CT group; affective reactivity did not differ. No significant changes in EC were observed between acute and delayed phases in any network, nor were there main effects of group or group × time interactions. Sensitivity analyses in severe MDD and multiple CT subtypes confirmed these null findings. Conclusions: Network centrality did not differentiate individuals with MDD and CT from controls following stress, while subjective tension responses were higher in the MDD + CT group. These results suggest that global resting-state network centrality may not be a sensitive indicator of stress vulnerability following CT. Future multimodal studies incorporating task-based paradigms and biological markers are warranted to elucidate the neural and behavioral pathways linking MDD, CT, and stress reactivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.