Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064564›Full record

ArticleInfection prevention in practice2026

Impact of an Anti-infection Double Lumen Bundle on the incidence of central venous catheter-related infections in haematological patients: a retrospective cohort study.

M Lazarevic Lindblad, E Pålsson, V Lazarevic, O Borgquist, T Kander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Lazarevic LindbladDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
E PålssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
V LazarevicDepartment of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
O BorgquistDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
T KanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in patients with haematological diseases but are associated with infectious complications. The CVC Anti-infection Double Lumen Bundle was introduced in December 2020 to reduce this risk. The bundle included a double-lumen noble metal alloy-coated CVC and chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings. This study evaluated whether the bundle was associated with a reduction in catheter-related infections. Methods: Non-tunnelled CVC insertions with a dwell time ≥24 h in adults treated for haematological diseases between May 2013 and June 2024 were included. Data were extracted from the electronic health records. The main objectives of the study were to investigate the proportions of suspected catheter-related infection (sCRI) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). Secondary objectives were catheter tip colonization and incidence of sCRI and CRBSI per 1000 catheter-days. Results: A total of 907 CVC insertions in 690 patients were analysed (471 before and 436 after the bundle implementation date). No differences were observed in the proportions of sCRI (6.4% vs 7.6%), CRBSI (0.4% vs 0.7%) or catheter tip colonization (4.7% vs 4.4%). The incidence per 1000 catheter-days also did not differ (sCRI: 1.67 vs 2.34 and CRBSI: 0.11 vs 0.21). In multi-variable analysis, no variables were associated with a higher risk of sCRI, whereas antibiotic administration at insertion was associated with a lower risk. Conclusion: The introduction of the Anti-infection Double Lumen Bundle did not reduce CVC-related infectious complications in patients with haematological diseases.

Indexed as

Catheter bundleCatheter-related infectionCentral venous catheterHaematologyInfection prevention

Identifiers

PMID42064564
PMCPMC13127321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.