Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064547›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

Bridging physiology and psychology: a new framework for teaching homeostasis.

Suzan Kamel-ElSayed, Nermien E Waly, Changiz Mohiyeddini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suzan Kamel-ElSayedDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester Hills, MI, United States.
Nermien E WalyMedical Physiology Deparment, School of Medicine, Capital University (formerly Helwan), Helwan, Egypt.
Changiz MohiyeddiniDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester Hills, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical physiology teaches homeostasis as a set of reactive feedback loops that stabilize the body's internal environment. Yet emerging science shows that human regulation is not merely reactive but profoundly shaped by cognition, emotion, belief, and predictive brain processes. We propose an updated definition of homeostasis that positions the brain as an anticipatory, meaning-making regulator integrating physiological, emotional, and environmental demands. This predictive regulation also unfolds across time through circadian organization, in which central neural systems coordinate daily rhythms in endocrine, immune, metabolic, and cognitive activity to prepare the organism for anticipated environmental and behavioral demands. By reframing homeostasis as a psychophysiological process, this work highlights the need for medical education to move beyond reductionist feedback-loop models and adopt a more integrated, clinically relevant understanding of human regulation. Within this framework, cognitive expectations, emotional appraisal, and circadian timing together shape how the brain allocates physiological resources in anticipation of daily challenges. This framework offers a rigorous yet human-centered lens for interpreting health, disease, and the therapeutic power of the clinical encounter.

Indexed as

allostasishomeostasisintegration in medical educationmedical education reformmedical physiologymind-body interactionpsychologypsychophysiology

Identifiers

PMID42064547
PMCPMC13126257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.