ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Chest compression superimposed with sustained inflation - translating preclinical findings into a neonatal clinical trial.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains associated with high mortality and significant risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. Current neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend a 3:1 compression-to-ventilation (C:V) ratio, which inherently requires frequent interruptions in chest compressions, limits ventilation efficiency, and may delay return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). To address these limitations, we have examined chest compressions with sustained inflation (CC + SI) as an alternative approach. Preliminary data from animal studies and pilot human trials suggest (1) improved tidal volume delivery, (2) facilitation of passive ventilation during compressions, (3) uninterrupted chest compressions, and (4) more stable cerebral blood flow during resuscitation. Experimental studies in asphyxiated animal models have demonstrated that CC + SI improves oxygenation, shortens time to ROSC, and reduces mortality without increasing pulmonary or cerebral injury when compared with standard 3:1 CPR. Two small pilot trials in human neonates support the feasibility of CC + SI. However, larger randomized controlled trials are required to validate these findings and determine whether CC + SI can safely and effectively replace the current 3:1 C:V approach as the standard of care in neonatal resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.