Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064541›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Translation and pilot-testing of the ReSPECT (Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment) form into Danish.

Mette Aaby Smith, Claire Gudex, Zoë Fritz, Heidi Maria Bergenholtz, Kristin Brønnum Nystrup, Sverre Strøm, Katrine Rahbek Schønnemann, Anette Stolberg Kargo, Lisbeth Antonsen, Philip Hasselqvist and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mette Aaby SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Claire GudexDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Zoë FritzThe Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, University of Cambridge, and Department of Acute Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals, United Kingdom.
Heidi Maria BergenholtzZealand University Hospital, Research Support Unit, Roskilde & Køge, Denmark.
Kristin Brønnum NystrupPalliative Care Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sverre StrømNr Åby General Practice, Nr Aaby, Denmark.
Katrine Rahbek SchønnemannPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anette Stolberg KargoPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lisbeth AntonsenDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Philip HasselqvistEmergency Department, University Hospital Zealand, Køge, Denmark.
Simon HøeghLangeland General Practice, Rudkøbing, Denmark.
Ann Dorthe ZwislerPalliative Care Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helene Korvenius NedergaardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Hanne Irene JensenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the UK, the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process and form are used to support shared decision-making and advance care planning, but ReSPECT has not been used in other countries. The aim of this study was to translate the English ReSPECT form into Danish and to pilot-test the Danish form in several healthcare-settings. Method: The ReSPECT form was translated into Danish using a forward and back translation process in line with standard international translation guidelines. The translated form was then pilot tested by patients, relatives and physicians in different health care settings. The participants subsequently completed a questionnaire about its usefulness. Results: 36 patients participated in the conversations; 15 patients, 11 relatives and 13 physicians completed the questionnaire. Most patients and relatives found that the document contained the information they needed, and that it was useful during a conversation about future wishes for treatment and care. Nearly two-thirds of the physicians considered the ReSPECT form to be highly useful for the conversations; and one-third thought it useful for clarifying the patient's healthcare status and recommending treatment. Half of the physicians identified missing or redundant information in the form. Conclusion: The Danish ReSPECT form was considered beneficial for conducting conversations about future treatment and care and clarifying patients' wishes in emergency situations. Further adjustments were identified to adapt the form to the Danish healthcare system. Translating and piloting the ReSPECT process into another languages is feasible and acceptable to patients and providers.

Indexed as

Advance care planningPatient-centred careResuscitationShared decision-makingTreatment escalation plans

Identifiers

PMID42064541
PMCPMC13127209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.