ArticleCureus2026
Single Antiplatelet Therapy With Ticagrelor in Flow-Diversion Treatment of Ruptured Dissecting Cerebral Pseudoaneurysms: A Meta-Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe management of ruptured dissecting cerebral pseudoaneurysms (RDPs) remains a significant neurosurgical challenge. Flow-diversion devices (FDDs) have emerged as an effective therapeutic option; however, their use typically necessitates dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which carries an inherent risk of hemorrhagic complications. This concern has led to growing interest in single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with ticagrelor, given its more predictable pharmacodynamic profile. Nevertheless, the evidence supporting the use of ticagrelor-based SAPT in this setting remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with ticagrelor among patients following flow-diversion treatment for ruptured cerebral pseudoaneurysms (RDPs).
methodsIn this study, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for screening and selecting research articles. Electronic databases used for data extraction were PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library. The research timeline was set from January 2015 to September 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to assess the quality of observational studies. This study used the Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.4 (London, England: Cochrane Collaboration) for pooled analysis.
resultsThrough a pooled analysis of six cohort or observational studies involving 1118 patients, the findings indicate that single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with ticagrelor may be comparable to standard dual antiplatelet therapy in managing thrombosis risk. The pooled analysis showed that the composite outcome of thromboembolic events, major hemorrhagic complications (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.53-1.38), and hemorrhagic complications alone (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.21-1.62) were not significantly different between patients receiving single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with ticagrelor and those receiving control antiplatelet regimens (including aspirin and clopidogrel), although the point estimates favored ticagrelor-based SAPT. Similarly, no statistically significant differences were observed in thromboembolic events (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.57-2.32) or mortality (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.21-6.39) between the treatment and control groups.
conclusionOverall, this meta-analysis suggests that single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with ticagrelor may be a feasible and potentially safe alternative to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing flow-diverter treatment for ruptured dissecting cerebral pseudoaneurysms (RDPs). The available evidence indicates comparable safety profiles, although the certainty of these findings remains limited. Therefore, well-designed randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies are warranted to more definitively evaluate efficacy, safety, and optimal patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.