ArticleCureus2026
A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives on Medication Error Among Healthcare Professionals.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedication error is a global problem worldwide, particularly in large healthcare systems where human error, systemic failures and other issues contribute to increase risk of mistakes. In spite of several efforts to improve patient safety, medication errors continue to result in significant patient harm. In countries like India, the complexity of healthcare system, varying access to resources, and rising demands contribute positively to the problem. This study focuses on the perspectives of healthcare professionals on medication error, its challenges and solutions. The objectives of the study were to to assess the perceptions of medication errors among the healthcare professionals and to identify the barriers in promoting safe medication use as well as to derive strategies to mitigate medication error. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study design using semi-structured interviews with doctors, nurses, and pharmacists of the Institute was employed. Thematic analysis was used to identify and understand the patterns in the data. We used purposive sampling to specifically include healthcare professionals who are directly involved in the medication process.
resultsData were collected from a total of 26 healthcare professionals which included 10 doctors, 13 nurses, and 3 pharmacists. We identified six predominant themes that included shortages in prescription orders, increased workloads and manpower shortages, mismatch in the dose and formulations available, and inadequate knowledge about reporting errors, use of electronic prescribing, open communication and availability of ready-to-use formulations. These factors contributed to higher error rates and made it difficult to improve safety.
conclusionTo reduce medication errors, we should address important issues like increase workload, bridging communication gap, use of technology to reduce medication error like electronic prescription and regular training of all healthcare professionals. This in turn will improving patient safety. Focusing on these areas is critical to preventing medication errors and ensuring high-quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.