Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064497›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Current Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Narrative Review of Nonoperative and Surgical Strategies.

Sol Angie Rincon Mora

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sol Angie Rincon MoraSurgery, Sanitas University Foundation, Bogota, COL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis remains one of the most common surgical emergencies worldwide and has traditionally been treated with appendectomy. However, growing evidence from randomized trials and international guidelines has challenged this paradigm, suggesting that nonoperative management with antibiotics may be a safe alternative for selected patients with uncomplicated disease. This narrative review aims to examine the current evidence on the management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis, with particular focus on the role of antibiotic therapy compared with surgical appendectomy, patient selection, and clinical outcomes. A narrative review of the literature was conducted using major medical databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and international guidelines published in recent years were analyzed to summarize current diagnostic strategies and treatment approaches for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Recent studies demonstrate that antibiotic therapy can successfully treat a substantial proportion of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, potentially avoiding immediate surgery. Nevertheless, nonoperative management is associated with higher rates of recurrence and subsequent appendectomy. The presence of an appendicolith has been consistently identified as a significant predictor of treatment failure. Laparoscopic appendectomy remains a safe and definitive treatment with low complication rates and minimal risk of recurrence. The management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is evolving from a strictly surgical disease to a condition with multiple evidence-based treatment options. While appendectomy remains the definitive therapy, antibiotic treatment represents a feasible alternative in carefully selected patients. A patient-centered approach that incorporates imaging findings, clinical risk factors, and shared decision-making is essential for optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

acute appendicitisantibiotic therapyappendectomylaparoscopic appendectomynonoperative management

Identifiers

PMID42064497
PMCPMC13124642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.