ArticleCureus2026
Association Between the Backhand Technique and the Prevalence of Dominant-Arm Elbow Pain and Low Back Pain in Tennis Players: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Tennis is a physically demanding sport characterized by explosive movements, repeated trunk rotations, and asymmetric loading of the dominant upper limb. Overuse injuries are common, with dominant-arm elbow pain (DEP) and low back pain (LBP) representing frequent musculoskeletal complaints among tennis players. Biomechanical differences between the one-handed backhand (1HB) and the two-handed backhand (2HB) may influence the distribution of mechanical loads on the upper limb and spine; however, their relationship with clinically relevant symptoms remains unclear. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to investigate the association between the backhand technique and the prevalence of DEP and LBP in a heterogeneous population of tennis players. Methodology An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed through tennis clubs and social media between February and November 2025. A total of 455 responses were collected, of which 445 complete questionnaires were included in the final analysis. Results The mean age of the participants was 35.1 ± 17.9 years, and 73.9% were male. The median weekly training volume was five hours (interquartile range = 3-11). In crude analyses, elbow pain was more frequent among players using the 1HB (56.5% vs. 32.9%, p < 0.001), while LBP was slightly more common in the same group (59.5% vs 49.5%, p = 0.049). However, multivariable Poisson regression models adjusted for age, sex, training volume, competitive level, and years of practice showed no independent association between the backhand technique and DEP (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-1.46; p = 0.625) or LBP (PR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.95-1.48; p = 0.142). Stratified analyses revealed that the 1HB was significantly more common among male players (p < 0.001), and elbow pain was also more prevalent in males (p = 0.00076), whereas the prevalence of LBP did not differ significantly between sexes (p = 0.798). Among participants reporting elbow symptoms (n = 190), 64.7% localized pain to the lateral epicondylar region and 35.3% to the medial epitrochlear region. Overall, the backhand technique was not independently associated with either elbow or lumbar symptoms. Conclusions These findings support a multifactorial model of injury risk in tennis, suggesting that factors such as age, sex, cumulative load, and player characteristics may play a greater role than the isolated choice of the backhand technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.