Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064470›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Agonistic Monoclonal Antibody against Robo4 versus Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Phase I, Open-Label, Multicenter Study.

Rubbia Afridi, Giorgio Senaldi, Jaclyn Joyce Hwang, Nam Nguyen, Tatsuya Inoue, Brian Berger, Sunil Patel, Zoha Zahid Fazal, Quan Dong Nguyen, Yasir Sepah

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02530918 (Phase I Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of DS-7080a in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration or Diabetic Macular Edema), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02530918 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of DS-7080a in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration or Diabetic Macular Edema

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaiichi SankyoRan2015 to 2018Enrolled56ConditionsNeovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular EdemaArmsDS-7080a, Ranibizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rubbia AfridiByers Eye Institute, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Giorgio SenaldiSpecialty Medicine Clinical Development, Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Jaclyn Joyce HwangByers Eye Institute, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Nam NguyenByers Eye Institute, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Tatsuya InoueDiscovery Research Laboratories IV, Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Brian BergerRetina Research Center, Austin, Texas.
Sunil PatelRetina Research Institute of Texas, Abilene, Texas.
Zoha Zahid FazalByers Eye Institute, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Quan Dong NguyenByers Eye Institute, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Yasir SepahByers Eye Institute, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of agonistic monoclonal antibody against roundabout receptor 4 (DS-7080a) in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) alone or in combination with ranibizumab. Design: This was a phase I dose escalation and expansion study registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02530918) and conducted in 3 parts. Parts 1 (first phase of the study [P1]) and 2 (second phase of the study [P2]) involved dose escalation and expansion for patients with nAMD, while part 3 (third phase of the study [P3]) involved dose expansion only for DME subjects. Subjects: Patients with nAMD or DME. Methods: In P1, eligible patients were randomized into 3 sequential dose-level cohorts to establish a maximum tolerated dose for DS-7080a as 4.0 mg and assess its safety and tolerability. The study then proceeded to P2, where 27 nAMD subjects were randomized to one of the 3 treatment arms: DS-7080a, 4.0 mg only; ranibizumab, 0.5 mg only; or DS-7080a, 4.0 mg plus ranibizumab, 0.5 mg. In P3, 20 subjects with DME were randomized to one of the 2 arms: DS-7080a, 4.0 mg or ranibizumab, 0.3 mg injected thrice. The treatment period was 12 weeks. Main Outcome Outcomes: The primary endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). The secondary endpoints were changes in central retinal thickness (central subfield thickness [CST]) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: A total of 56 patients were enrolled. Agonistic monoclonal antibody against Robo4, administered as monotherapy or in combination with ranibizumab, was generally well tolerated. Six drug-related TEAEs were observed, 4 of which were ocular events that led to treatment discontinuation. No drug-related SAEs or deaths occurred. As expected, ranibizumab was associated with improvements in BCVA and CST, whereas DS-7080a, alone or in combination, did not show clinically meaningful functional or anatomical benefit. Conclusions: Agonistic monoclonal antibody against Robo4 was generally well tolerated in eyes with nAMD and DME; however, drug-related TEAEs, including ocular events leading to discontinuation, were observed. In terms of efficacy outcomes, DS-7080a does not show BCVA improvement and CST decrease when administered alone or in conjunction with ranibizumab. These findings are inconsistent with nonclinical studies supporting DS-7080a as a therapeutic agent for nAMD and DME. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

DMERanibizumabRetinal thicknessRobo4 agonistWet AMD

Identifiers

PMID42064470
PMCPMC13126018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.