ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Microbial signatures in follicular fluid and their association with fertilization success.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emerging evidence suggests that the upper female reproductive tract is not sterile and that microbial signals within follicular fluid (FF) may influence oocyte competence. However, previous studies have largely relied on pooled FF samples or dominant follicles, limiting insight into follicle-specific associations with fertilization outcomes. Methods: In this exploratory paired study, follicular fluid samples were collected from 24 women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. For each patient, two FF samples were analyzed individually: one associated with a fertilized oocyte, and one associated with an oocyte that failed fertilization. Bacterial DNA and total bacterial load (TBL) were assessed using quantitative real-time PCR targeting predefined microbial taxa. Results: Bacterial DNA above the predefined detection threshold was identified in 39.6% of all FF samples. Notably, within this exploratory cohort, FF samples associated with fertilization failure were more frequently TBL-positive compared with FF samples linked to successful fertilization (70.8% vs. 8.3%). Follicles from the same patient often differed in bacterial DNA presence, indicating substantial intra-individual variability. Several bacterial taxa, including Conclusion: In this paired follicle-level analysis, the absence of detectable bacterial DNA in follicular fluid was associated with fertilization outcome. These findings highlight follicle-level heterogeneity in microbial DNA detection and underscore the importance of follicle-specific analyses in reproductive microbiome research. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these observations and to clarify the biological mechanisms underlying follicular microbial signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.