ReviewACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2026
Braiding Knowledge Systems: Integrating Indigenous Wisdom and Sustainable Research for a Regenerative Future.
Review in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Perspective explores and calls for the integration of Indigenous knowledge systems within sustainability science to address urgent environmental, social, and economic challenges. Insights emerged from a collaborative workshop held in Baawaating (Algoma District, Ontario, Canada) with knowledge holders, practitioners, scholars, and community leaders, including members from the Ketegaunseebee (Garden River) and Batchewana First Nations. The paper examines how Indigenous ways of being, thinking, and knowing can enrich sustainability research. This work focuses on mapping parallels and distinctions between Indigenous and other sustainability practices with regard to the planet, the land, and relationships. It explores systems thinking, circularity, and Two-Eyed Seeing as a way to reimagine human-land relationships through place-based knowledge and stewardship. We stress the importance of embedding purpose and intention in scientific inquiry and propose examples such as ceremonial practices, seven-generational thinking, and relational accountability. The Perspective calls for a paradigm shift beyond Western-centric and reductionist approaches, which lead to endless economic growth, toward holistic, interconnected, and intentional frameworks that respect Indigenous worldviews. A series of concrete calls to action urge sustainability researchers to integrate Indigenous knowledge respectfully, foster long-term collaborative relationships, and adopt regenerative and relational approaches in their scholarship. This will contribute to restoring the balance needed among cultures and between humanity and the natural world. Collectively, as sustainability scholars, we want to see meaningful change and encourage a paradigm shift: to embrace inclusive, holistic approaches that contribute to impactful, results-oriented actions that restore health to our world. You can do this through being advocates for change to promote reconciliation, strengthen intercultural relationships, and support greater well-being for all, and, in doing so, protect the planet by reducing ecological harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.