Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064404›Full record

ReviewACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2026

Braiding Knowledge Systems: Integrating Indigenous Wisdom and Sustainable Research for a Regenerative Future.

Elizabeth Edgar-Webkamigad, Jody-Lynn Rebek, Michael R Twiss, Pedro Madeira Antunes, Isabelle Aubin, Isabel Molina, Jordan M Barone, Aaron Jones, Audrey Moores

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth Edgar-WebkamigadHealth and Human Services, Batchewana First Nation, 210 A Gran Street, Batchewana First Nation, Ontario P6C 0C4, Canada.
Jody-Lynn RebekDepartment of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Economics, Algoma University, 1520 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2G4, Canada.
Michael R TwissDepartment of Biology, Cameron Faculty of Science, Algoma University, 1520 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2G4, Canada.
Pedro Madeira AntunesDepartment of Biology, Cameron Faculty of Science, Algoma University, 1520 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2G4, Canada.
Isabelle AubinGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5, Canada.
Isabel MolinaDepartment of Biology, Cameron Faculty of Science, Algoma University, 1520 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2G4, Canada.
Jordan M BaroneDepartment of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Economics, Algoma University, 1520 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2G4, Canada.
Aaron JonesLands and Resources Department, Ketegaunseebee (Garden River First Nation), 183 Noonday Drive, Garden River First Nation, Ontario P6A 0A3, Canada.
Audrey MooresCentre in Green Chemistry and Catalysis, Department of Chemistry, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0B8, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1259-913X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Perspective explores and calls for the integration of Indigenous knowledge systems within sustainability science to address urgent environmental, social, and economic challenges. Insights emerged from a collaborative workshop held in Baawaating (Algoma District, Ontario, Canada) with knowledge holders, practitioners, scholars, and community leaders, including members from the Ketegaunseebee (Garden River) and Batchewana First Nations. The paper examines how Indigenous ways of being, thinking, and knowing can enrich sustainability research. This work focuses on mapping parallels and distinctions between Indigenous and other sustainability practices with regard to the planet, the land, and relationships. It explores systems thinking, circularity, and Two-Eyed Seeing as a way to reimagine human-land relationships through place-based knowledge and stewardship. We stress the importance of embedding purpose and intention in scientific inquiry and propose examples such as ceremonial practices, seven-generational thinking, and relational accountability. The Perspective calls for a paradigm shift beyond Western-centric and reductionist approaches, which lead to endless economic growth, toward holistic, interconnected, and intentional frameworks that respect Indigenous worldviews. A series of concrete calls to action urge sustainability researchers to integrate Indigenous knowledge respectfully, foster long-term collaborative relationships, and adopt regenerative and relational approaches in their scholarship. This will contribute to restoring the balance needed among cultures and between humanity and the natural world. Collectively, as sustainability scholars, we want to see meaningful change and encourage a paradigm shift: to embrace inclusive, holistic approaches that contribute to impactful, results-oriented actions that restore health to our world. You can do this through being advocates for change to promote reconciliation, strengthen intercultural relationships, and support greater well-being for all, and, in doing so, protect the planet by reducing ecological harm.

Indexed as

ceremonycircularityholistic scienceIndigenous knowledge systemsrelational approachessustainability researchsystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID42064404
PMCPMC13126675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.