Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064401›Full record

ReviewBJR artificial intelligence2024

Diffusion models for medical image reconstruction.

George Webber, Andrew J Reader

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Personalized MR-Informed Diffusion Models for 3D PET Image Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. CONSISTENCY MODELS FOR FAST MRI USING REGULARIZATION BY DENOISING.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George WebberSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2573-7690
Andrew J ReaderSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-3383

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better algorithms for medical image reconstruction can improve image quality and enable reductions in acquisition time and radiation dose. A prior understanding of the distribution of plausible images is key to realising these benefits. Recently, research into deep-learning image reconstruction has started to look into using unsupervised diffusion models, trained only on high-quality medical images (ie, without needing paired scanner measurement data), for modelling this prior understanding. Image reconstruction algorithms incorporating unsupervised diffusion models have already attained state-of-the-art accuracy for reconstruction tasks ranging from highly accelerated MRI to ultra-sparse-view CT and low-dose PET. Key advantages of diffusion model approach over previous deep learning approaches for reconstruction include state-of-the-art image distribution modelling, improved robustness to domain shift, and principled quantification of reconstruction uncertainty. If hallucination concerns can be alleviated, their key advantages and impressive performance could mean these algorithms are better suited to clinical use than previous deep-learning approaches. In this review, we provide an accessible introduction to image reconstruction and diffusion models, outline guidance for using diffusion-model-based reconstruction methodology, summarise modality-specific challenges, and identify key research themes. We conclude with a discussion of the opportunities and challenges of using diffusion models for medical image reconstruction.

Indexed as

CTdeep learningdiffusion modelsimage reconstruction algorithmsMRIPETscore-based generative modelsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42064401
PMCPMC13045694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.