Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064393›Full record

ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2024

Making head and neck cancer clinical data Findable-Accessible-Interoperable-Reusable to support multi-institutional collaboration and federated learning.

Varsha Gouthamchand, Ananya Choudhury, Frank J P Hoebers, Frederik W R Wesseling, Mattea Welch, Sejin Kim, Joanna Kazmierska, Andre Dekker, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Johan van Soest and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Varsha GouthamchandClinical Data Science, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229 EN, The Netherlands.
Ananya ChoudhuryClinical Data Science, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229 EN, The Netherlands.
Frank J P HoebersDept of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), School of Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Frederik W R WesselingDept of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), School of Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Mattea WelchRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Sejin KimCancer Digital Intelligence, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Joanna KazmierskaDept of Radiation Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre II, Poznan 61-866, Poland.
Andre DekkerClinical Data Science, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229 EN, The Netherlands.
Benjamin Haibe-KainsMedical Biophysics University of Toronto, Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0C6, Canada.
Johan van SoestBrightlands Institute for Smart Society, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, Heerlen 6411 CR, The Netherlands.
Leonard WeeClinical Data Science, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229 EN, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-9055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Federated learning (FL) is a group of methodologies where statistical modelling can be performed without exchanging identifiable patient data between cooperating institutions. To realize its potential for AI development on clinical data, a number of bottlenecks need to be addressed. One of these is making data Findable-Accessible-Interoperable-Reusable (FAIR). The primary aim of this work is to show that tools making data FAIR allow consortia to collaborate on privacy-aware data exploration, data visualization, and training of models on each other's original data. Methods: We propose a "Schema-on-Read" FAIR-ification method that adapts for different (re)analyses without needing to change the underlying original data. The procedure involves (1) decoupling the contents of the data from its schema and database structure, (2) annotation with semantic ontologies as a metadata layer, and (3) readout using semantic queries. Open-source tools are given as Docker containers to help local investigators prepare their data on-premises. Results: We created a federated privacy-preserving visualization dashboard for case mix exploration of 5 distributed datasets with no common schema at the point of origin. We demonstrated robust and flexible prognostication model development and validation, linking together different data sources-clinical risk factors and radiomics. Conclusions: Our procedure leads to successful (re)use of data in FL-based consortia without the need to impose a common schema at every point of origin of data. Advances in knowledge: This work supports the adoption of FL within the healthcare AI community by sharing means to make data more FAIR.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceFAIR datafederated learningontologiesRDFSemantic Web

Identifiers

PMID42064393
PMCPMC13045714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.