Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064380›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Lessons learned from piloting a heart failure-based remote management care system in a general internal medicine program: A qualitative evaluation.

Sarah Vc Lawrason, Heather J Ross, Anne Simard, Tarek Abdelhalim, William K Silverstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Vc LawrasonPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-8655
Heather J RossPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-3027
Anne SimardPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7977-9311
Tarek AbdelhalimDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-1350
William K SilversteinDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-7369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Medly is a remote patient management (RPM) tool that allows patients with heart failure (HF) to record daily measures to inform health status and receive personalized care instructions by a validated algorithm. Medly has been standard-of-care for patients with HF in the Cardiology Division at University Health Network since 2016. While patients with HF are often admitted to general internal medicine (GIM), there are few HF RPM programs used in the GIM setting. We piloted Medly for patients discharged from GIM in the summer of 2023. The purpose of this study was to understand staff factors that enabled or inhibited spread and scale of Medly into a GIM setting. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 staff involved in the planning, delivery, and implementation of Medly in the GIM setting. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results: Implementation factors included: (1) communicative staff, (2) Medly adaptability and relative advantage, (3) need for long-term funding, (4) leadership engagement and learning-centered culture, and (5) sociodemographic characteristics of patients. Conclusion: This study offers valuable insight into how an RPM can be adopted from the Cardiology to GIM context. Key enablers include providing appropriate staff time and compensation, engaging leadership early and often, modifying the application for the setting, and considering equity with respect to language barriers. A larger pilot with more than 10 patients actively embedded in the GIM pathway is required for further scale of the program.

Indexed as

health servicesprogram evaluationquality improvementTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42064380
PMCPMC13125798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.