ArticleDigital health
Deep ensemble of multi-head attention CNNs for histopathological image-based of lung and colon cancer diagnosis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Classifying lung and colon cancer from histopathological images remains a significant challenge due to the high degree of intra-class feature similarity and complex tissue morphology, particularly in lung cancer cases. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated strong spatial feature extraction capabilities, they cannot inherently model long-range dependencies and global contextual relationships. Although attention-based methods partially address these limitations, they often suffer from overfitting, limited generalization across heterogeneous datasets, and insufficient interpretability for clinical adoption. To address these challenges, this study presents a Multi-Head Attention-Based Convolutional Neural Network (MHAB-CNN) ensemble framework that captures localized and global feature interactions critical for robust cancer classification. Methods: A Results: Experimental evaluation on the LC25000 dataset demonstrates that the proposed framework achieves an average validation accuracy of 99.84% across folds. Furthermore, the E3 ensemble configuration, comprising models M1, M6, and M9, achieves the highest classification score on the held-out test set. Conclusion: The proposed MHAB-CNN ensemble framework effectively captures localized and global feature interactions critical for robust lung and colon cancer classification, while improving robustness, reducing overfitting, and enhancing interpretability for potential clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.