ArticleBrain & spine2026
Distal nerve transfers for ulnar nerve reinnervation and hand function restoration.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of life in patients following distal nerve transfers for the restoration of elbow flexion and extension- single center experience.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Technical progress and clinical application of distal nerve transfers.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ulnar nerve injuries lead to severe intrinsic hand muscle dysfunction and major impairment of grip, pinch, and quality of life. Distal nerve transfers have been introduced to overcome the limitations of conventional repair and grafting by shortening the regeneration distance and improving reinnervation of intrinsic muscles. Research question: Can distal anterior interosseous nerve to deep motor branch of the ulnar nerve (AIN-to-UN-DMB) transfer restore intrinsic hand function and improve patient-reported quality of life in proximal ulnar nerve injuries? Material and methods: Twelve patients with proximal ulnar nerve injuries underwent distal AIN-to-UN-DMB transfer and were prospectively evaluated at 24 months postoperatively. Outcomes included intrinsic muscle strength graded by the BMRC scale, Egawa's sign, dynamometric assessment of grasp and pinch strength, and quality of life measured using the PNSQoL questionnaire. Results: At final follow-up, intrinsic muscle strength improved markedly: 27 muscles achieved M4 and 14 achieved M3 strength, compared with universal M0 preoperatively. Grasp strength increased from a mean of 42.3% to 82.5%, and pinch strength from 37.4% to 80.5% of the contralateral hand. Overall satisfactory functional recovery was achieved in 87.5% of patients. Mean PNSQoL score improved significantly from 47.7 preoperatively to 74.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001), with all patients reaching very good or excellent quality-of-life categories. Discussion and conclusion: Distal AIN-to-UN-DMB transfer enables meaningful restoration of intrinsic hand function, substantial gains in grasp and pinch strength, and significant improvement in quality of life, representing an effective reconstructive option for proximal ulnar nerve injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.