ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
PlantPathNet: a novel network based on cross-layer feature integration for plant disease classification.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Dual-Side Synergistic LoRA Framework for Full-Chain Fine-Tuning of Qwen2.5-VL for Plant Disease Diagnosis.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reliable identification of plant diseases from leaf images is essential for effective crop monitoring and the prevention of yield deterioration. With the growing adoption of deep learning in agricultural applications, convolutional neural network-based classifiers have demonstrated notable success in visual plant disease recognition. Methods: In this study, we propose Results: Extensive experiments conducted on the PlantVillage dataset demonstrate that PlantPathNet outperforms several state-of-the-art models, including ResNet-50, Inception-V3, DenseNet121, VGG16, and Vision Transformer-based approaches. The proposed model achieves an overall accuracy of 99.57%, precision of 99.52%, recall of 99.54%, F1-score of 99.53%, and an AUROC of 99.84%. Discussion: The results indicate that the integration of HSV-based preprocessing, CFIM, and channel attention significantly enhances classification performance. The proposed framework provides a robust and efficient solution for automated plant disease diagnosis and has strong potential for real-world agricultural applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.