Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064298›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

Global meta-analysis of plasma-activated water for improving crop establishment, productivity, and health.

Nawab Ali, Younsuk Dong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nawab AliBiosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Younsuk DongBiosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasma-activated water (PAW) has emerged as a promising eco-friendly technology and a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers in agriculture due to its role in plant growth, nutrition, and disease suppression. To comprehensively evaluate its effectiveness, a meta-analysis was conducted using published studies comprising diverse crops, experimental conditions, and PAW generation chemistry. Log response ratios (LnRR) and pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and forest plots were generated for each response variable. Results revealed that PAW application significantly improved plant growth and pigment content (chlorophyll a, b, and c and carotenoids), along with total soluble solids (TSS), total soluble protein (TSP), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), superoxidase dismutase (SOD), and total phenolic content (TPC) supporting improved metabolic activity. Moreover, a significant reduction in disease incidence and severity under PAW application ensured enhanced plant defense responses. Plasma activation altered water chemistry by lowering pH and increasing electrical conductivity, nitrate, nitrite, H

Indexed as

biophysicochemical traitsdisease controlplasma activated water (PAW)productivityreactive speciessustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID42064298
PMCPMC13124626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.