Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064288›Full record

ArticleLife metabolism2026

Reducing the strain on calorie restriction.

John R Speakman, Sharon E Mitchell

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Life metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John R SpeakmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, United Kingdom.
Sharon E MitchellSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3941-0309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calorie restriction (CR) is a nutritional intervention known to delay aging and extend lifespan across a wide range of species, raising the possibility of similar benefits in humans. This apparent universality has been questioned by studies reporting shortened lifespan under CR in certain mouse strains. Here, we provide a short perspective on these conflicting findings. Using simple simulation analyses, we explored the apparent strain-specific effects on CR outcomes. Our results illustrate how experimental factors have confounded previous interpretations and led to overemphasis on genotype effects. Reproducible CR studies are crucial for understanding the true potential of CR as a broadly applicable intervention in aging.

Indexed as

artefactcalorie restrictionmousesample sizestrain

Identifiers

PMID42064288
PMCPMC13128265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.