Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064272›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026

Implementation and impact of simulated patient perspective exercises in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review.

Anna Christine Steinacker, Michael Klingenberg, Stefan Bösner

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna Christine SteinackerUniversity of Applied Sciences Fulda, Fulda, Germany.
Michael KlingenbergUniversity of Applied Sciences Fulda, Fulda, Germany.
Stefan BösnerPhilipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Exercises that immerse nursing students in the patient perspective are increasingly used to support empathy and reflective learning. This scoping review aimed to map the current literature on these exercises in undergraduate nursing education, focusing on their design, reported effects, and pedagogical implications. Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science, completing the final database search in Nov 2024. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed empirical research involving undergraduate nursing students. Relevant data were extracted, categorized using a standardized charting form, and synthesized thematically to identify common patterns across studies. Results: Twenty-two studies published between 2009 and 2024 were included in this scoping review. Studies used qualitative, quantitative or mixed-method designs and examined simulations focused on aging, disability, or mental health. Three key themes were identified: (1) students' responses during the simulation exercises, (2) perceived impact after the exercises and (3) ethical and pedagogical considerations related to implementation. Conclusions: Patient perspective simulations may enhance empathy and support reflective practice among nursing students. However, ethical concerns, questions of authenticity, and varied implementation approaches highlight the need for thoughtful design. Further research should explore long-term effects and establish best practices for integrating these exercises into nursing curricula.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureatePatient SimulationStudents, NursingEmpathyHumanseducation nursingembodied learningempathyexperiential learningsimulation training

Identifiers

PMID42064272
PMCPMC13124500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.