Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064240›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Endoscopic versus open surgery for soft tissue vascular anomalies and benign tumors: a two-center propensity score-matched study.

Ming Li, Huaijie Wang, Zhengtuan Guo, Chong Xie, Weilong Lin, Peihua Wang, Weijia Yang, Lingling He, Lijuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ming LiDepartment of Burn & Plastic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, China.
Huaijie WangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Vascular Anomalies, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Zhengtuan GuoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Vascular Anomalies, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Chong XieDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Vascular Anomalies, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Weilong LinDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Vascular Anomalies, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Peihua WangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Vascular Anomalies, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Weijia YangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Vascular Anomalies, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Lingling HeDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Vascular Anomalies, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Lijuan ZhangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery & Vascular Anomalies, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: No large-scale study has compared the outcomes of soft-tissue endoscopic surgery (SOFTES) with conventional open surgery (OS) for vascular anomalies and benign soft tissue tumors. We aimed to compare the operative safety, efficacy, and outcomes of the two approaches for soft tissue lesions. Methods: Patients ( Results: After matching, 150 patients (SOFTES: 75; OS: 75) were included. Compared with the OS group, the estimated blood loss in the SOFTES group was significantly lower [20 mL (1-500) vs. 50 mL (5-600); Conclusions: Endoscopic surgery is a safe and effective treatment option for various vascular anomalies and benign soft tissue tumors in selected patients. This paradigm shift has many advantages in terms of clinical outcomes and reduces postoperative complications.

Indexed as

endoscopic surgeryFAVAlipomaPTENsurgeryvascular malformation

Identifiers

PMID42064240
PMCPMC13125068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.