SynthesisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Salivary microbial meta-analysis reveals gender differences in oral microbiota, core microbiota, and molecular markers.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saliva harbors a complex human microbiota closely linked to the occurrence and progression of various diseases. This meta-analysis of public 16S saliva data aimed to expand understanding of the microbiota's associations with multiple diseases and explore its potential as molecular markers for multi-disease prediction, overcoming the limitation of single-disease-focused studies. From PubMed (2016-2024), 22 cohorts met the screening criteria (V3-V4 region 13 cohorts, V4 region 9 cohorts), comprising 7,750 samples. Bioinformatics analyses using QIIME2, Wekemo, and statistical modeling revealed saliva microbiota community characteristics, identified core microbes in the negative control group, and constructed a multi-disease prediction model based on 16S data. Key findings included: (1) significant differences in microbiota structure across physiological/pathological states (e.g., NPC groups resembled controls but diverged from colorectal cancer and PLHIV groups at the genus level); (2) Nine core microbiota, such as g:Streptococcus and g:Haemophilus_D_735815, were identified in the saliva samples of the negative control group; (3) robust classification performance of multi-class random forest models (AUC: 0.898-0.995 for V3-V4, 0.957-1 for V4). This study validated the feasibility of establishing healthy baselines via saliva microbiota and using machine learning for non-invasive disease diagnosis. Future research should expand disease coverage, increase sample sizes, and further investigate microbiota-disease associations to advance the development of non-invasive diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.