Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064208›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

A qualitative investigation of stakeholders' perceptions of social prescribing for families with infants through the lens of a creative play on prescription programme for 0-2-year-olds and their carers.

Paige E Davis, Jenny Retzler, Susanna Kola-Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paige E DavisUniversity of Leeds, UK.
Jenny RetzlerUniversity of Leeds, UK.
Susanna Kola-PalmerUniversity of Huddersfield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Classically social prescription interventions focus on loneliness in adulthood, however another transitional stage of the lifespan associated with loneliness is new parenthood. A first-of-its-kind, socially prescribed, creative play programme is being trialed for families with 0-2-year-olds in a deprived ward in the North of England. Yet little is known about the perspectives of key stakeholders on this type of social prescription. This study examined the experience, attitudes and perspectives stakeholders hold around social prescription for families with infants. Study design: Individual in depth interview study. Method: This study recruited 12 different stakeholders with practice or policy roles relating to family health and wellbeing, from general practitioners to members of parliament, with different power dynamics and roles to take part in a seven-question semi-structured interview. The interview addressed relationships between stakeholders, how they feel families might value or stigmatize socially prescribed creative play interventions and their thoughts and experiences with social prescription. The interview transcripts were analysed using an inductive descriptive thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes were identified 1) Conclusions: Findings suggest social prescription for families with infants would be welcome, and may relieve strain on our health systems. However, questions remain around how best to deliver such interventions, demonstrating the importance of evaluation to provide evidence to inform wider commissioning and promote sustainability and scaling.

Indexed as

Family supportPlay interventionPsychological well-beingSocial prescriptionStakeholder participation

Identifiers

PMID42064208
PMCPMC13126031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.