Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064207›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026

Competency-based compensation adjustment model: A new paradigm for clinical research coordinator merit advancement.

Kate Marusina, Paige Kular, David Grigoryan, Brian Linhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kate MarusinaClinical and Translational Science Center, UC Davis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5370-1108
Paige KularClinical and Translational Science Center, UC Davis, USA.
David GrigoryanHuman Resources, UC Davis, Davis, USA.
Brian LinhardtHuman Resources, UC Davis, Davis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attrition of experienced clinical research coordinators (CRCs) remains one of the most significant challenges to clinical and translational research. While multiple factors contribute to CRC retention, adequate compensation remains one of the most important. This manuscript describes a novel methodology for applying Joint Task Force (JTF) clinical research competencies as a guiding framework for salary adjustments via a pilot program for clinical research staff. This methodology can be adapted to a variety of institutional settings, especially in environments where opportunities for salary advancement are constrained by labor contracts. At UC Davis, CRC salary advancements are defined by contractual agreements with the Union of the Professional and Technical Employees, Research Support Professionals Unit (UPTE RX). While the union contract allows for periodic, across-the-board (all UPTE RX members) salary increases, it does not include clear provisions for merit-or competency-based increases. The CRC Equity Pathway is the first institutional compensation strategy that ties salary advancement to CRC competency, taking a significant step toward eliminating historical salary inequities. The pilot program described in this manuscript demonstrated that the CRC Equity Pathway is a viable mechanism for standardizing job descriptions around the JTF competencies, and for informing corresponding salary adjustments.

Indexed as

clinical researchclinical research coordinatorscompensationcompetencyworkforce

Identifiers

PMID42064207
PMCPMC13126407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.