Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064158›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

The conversing military chaplain: time allocation, task salience, and competencies among Swedish military chaplains.

Jan Grimell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jan GrimellDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Military chaplaincy is an established yet multifaceted practice within military organizations and is exposed to particular stressors such as the use of violence, ethical dilemmas, loss, and existential vulnerability. This study examines how a Swedish normative framework for Military Soul Care (ACCES: advisory role, command and crisis support, ceremonies, education, and soul care conversations) interacts with Swedish military chaplains' own experiences of what they perceive as most important and meaningful in their mission. The empirical material consists of qualitative questionnaire data collected in 2025 from 50 military chaplains. The material was analyzed using an abductive approach and organized thematically. The results show that conversations constitute the task to which the greatest amount of time is devoted across both main categories of military chaplains, and that conversations are understood broadly, ranging from informal everyday interactions to confidential individual soul care conversations. Various forms of ceremonies and crisis support related to death and grief were experienced as particularly meaningful and reflect a clearly articulated priestly identity. Educational tasks varied between categories, with time constraints and organizational priorities limiting opportunities depending on context. A central finding is that presence within the organization, aimed at building relationships and trust, emerges as a decisive prerequisite and contributes to many chaplains working beyond their contracted hours. The importance of presence is not explicitly articulated in the ACCES framework but rather permeates the mission implicitly. Against the backdrop of a changed security environment, the findings illustrate that ecclesial priestly competencies related to crisis response, death, grief, and funeral expertise constitute a particularly vital resource in situations of crisis and war.

Indexed as

competenciesmilitary Chaplainsmilitary soul caremoral injurypastoral carespiritual care

Identifiers

PMID42064158
PMCPMC13125012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.