ReviewJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
Bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials in oral submucous fibrosis.
Review in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bibliometric analysis uses citation analysis to assess the impact of the research publications. This analysis investigated the most cited articles that are exclusively on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) to help get an overview of the clinical research published to date. Articles were searched on the Scopus database with the terms 'oral submucous fibrosis' and 'randomized controlled trial' till March 2025. The Web of Science was used for citation cross-validation with Scopus. The number of citations, journals, authors, and country of origin were all reviewed. Co-occurrence analysis was carried out with the help of VOSviewer software. The data was collected from 2006 to 2024, with the maximum research papers published in 2015. A highest citation of 129 was recorded with a mean citation of 22 (standard deviation = 30.4627). The 25 articles were published in 16 different journals with the highest impact factor of 3.4, and the majority of which (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.