ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
An agent-based learning model integrating sex differences in renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sex-based differences influence tumor biology, immune responses, and treatment outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), yet most computational models do not jointly incorporate sex hormones, immune composition, and tumor genetic evolution. Agent-based models (ABMs) effectively simulate tumor-immune interactions but are rarely extended to include sex-specific modulation or machine learning-based optimization. This study enhanced an agent-based learning model (ALM) to simulate RCC progression and treatment response by integrating hormonal effects, immune interactions, and tumor genetic adaptation with data-driven tuning. Methods: An RCC-specific ALM was developed incorporating immune agents (CD8+, NK, Treg, dendritic cells), hormone-sensitive mechanisms, tumor genetic modules, and effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors ( Results: Simulations reproduced sex-specific treatment responses. Female models showed delayed initial responses but stronger late immune activation and rapid tumor regression, whereas male models exhibited more stable early responses but greater tumor resilience driven by genetic adaptations. Adaptive learning showed capability of reducing prediction error with both fitness functions. Conclusions: This ALM offers an exploratory framework to provide preliminary insights into how sex hormones, immune dynamics, and tumor genetics may jointly contribute to shaping RCC treatment outcomes. Although the limited sample size constrains validation, the results suggest the potential of combining ABMs with biological data-driven optimization to support patient prediction and call for further investigation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.