ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026
Radiomics analysis of multiphase contrast-enhanced CT imaging for differentiating primary gastric lymphoma and Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate a CT-based radiomics model for differentiating primary gastric lymphoma (PGL) from Borrmann type IV gastric cancer (GC). Materials and methods: A total of 136 patients with pathologically confirmed PGL (n = 56) and Borrmann type IV GC (n = 80) were retrospectively enrolled between January 2016 and May 2022. The cohort was randomly partitioned into a training set (n = 95) and a testing set (n = 41) at a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics features were extracted from unenhanced, arterial, venous, double-phase (arterial + venous), and three-phase (unenhanced + arterial + venous) CT images. After feature selection using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, radiomics models were constructed via logistic regression. A clinical-radiomics model was developed through multivariate analysis. The models were evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision Curve Analysis (DCA) for clinical net benefit. Results: Clinical model comprised of high-enhanced serosa sign, normalized CT value on venous phase, and perigastric fat infiltration showed good performance with AUCs of 0.902 (training set) and 0.878 (testing set). Among the radiomics models, the three-phase model outperformed others (AUC: 0.871 training, 0.865 testing). The clinical-radiomics combined model further improved discriminatory performance, achieving AUCs of 0.960 and 0.932 in the training and testing sets, respectively. DCA confirmed that the combined model provided the highest clinical net benefit. Conclusion: Clinical-radiomics model incorporating three-phase radiomics signatures and CT findings achieved satisfactory performance for differentiating PGL from Borrmann type IV GC, serving as a reliable non-invasive tool for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.