ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026
Correlation of patient reported outcomes and physical exam screening for pelvic floor dysfunction: An opportunity for improved quality of life during chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To define the prevalence and time course of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) among cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: In a prospective study, women receiving curative-intent CRT were assessed for PFD at baseline, mid-treatment (3 weeks), completion (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months) through pelvic exams and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A standardized pelvic floor exam was performed at each time point by a trained oncologist, with pelvic floor pain defined as levator/obturator score > 3. Correlations between exam findings and PROM scores were analyzed using Spearman's coefficient, and changes over time were assessed with ANOVA. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled, most with FIGO stage III disease, and received concurrent cisplatin. At baseline, 50% had PFD, improving to 25% by follow-up. EORTC QLQ-CX24 scores showed consistent positive correlations with exam findings at baseline (ρ = 0.465, p < 0.001), mid-treatment (ρ = 0.444, p < 0.001), and follow-up (ρ = 0.398, p < 0.001). PFIQ-7 demonstrated significant negative correlations, while PFDI-20 showed no consistent correlations. PROM trends indicated substantial improvement in EORTC QLQ-CX24 scores from pre-treatment to follow-up, paralleling exam findings. Conclusions: Half of patients with advanced cervical cancer exhibit PFD prior to CRT. While the lack of validated PROM thresholds limits their use for initial diagnosis, the EORTC QLQ-CX24 correlated most consistently with exams, highlighting its potential superiority as a non-invasive monitoring tool for PFD. Additional studies are warranted to determine if early intervention would benefit patients with pre-existing PFD and identify strategies for management of persistent dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.