Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064004›Full record

ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2025

Addressing data scarcity in CT imaging: novel approaches for the detection of radiation-induced pneumonitis.

Sotiris Raptis, Christos Ilioudis, Kiki Theodorou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sotiris RaptisMedical Physics Department, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larisa 41500, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-966X
Christos IlioudisDepartment of Information and Electronic Engineering, International Hellenic University (IHU), Thessaloniki 57001, Greece.
Kiki TheodorouMedical Physics Department, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larisa 41500, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) is a critical complication of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients, and its early detection remains a challenge due to the limited availability of annotated CT imaging data and the subtle nature of disease evolution. The objective of this study is to enhance the detection and localization of RP in CT by integrating advanced data augmentation, self-supervised learning, and synthetic data generation techniques. Methods: A conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) was used to create synthetic RP images conditioned on lung segmentation masks to create anatomically plausible data for augmenting the training sets. The pipeline was created to possess double-stage self-supervised training with hierarchical pretext tasks to achieve robust features. Results: The performance of the proposed framework, for a 5-fold cross-validation, has an average accuracy of 94.04%, precision of 92.06%, with a recall of 95.1%, an F1-score of 93.56%, and area under the curve of 95.94%. Conclusions: The model was demonstrated to possess superior performance and stability in RP detection and localization, which suggests potential clinical translation. Advances in knowledge: The paper offers a novel fusion of cGAN-generated synthetic data, spatial attention, and contrastive learning to address RP detection in limited data. Interpretability is achieved by introducing Bayesian uncertainty estimation to provide translational value in clinical practice.

Indexed as

GAN-generated imageslung cancerradiation pneumonitisradiomics integrationspatial attention mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID42064004
PMCPMC13045680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.