Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064002›Full record

ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2025

Deep learning automates Cobb angle measurement compared with multi-expert observers.

Keyu Li, Hanxue Gu, Roy Colglazier, Robert Lark, Elizabeth Hubbard, Robert French, Denise Smith, Jikai Zhang, Erin McCrum, Anthony Catanzano and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Identifying scoliosis in a population-based adult cohort: automation of a validated method based on total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Keyu LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Hanxue GuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-753X
Roy ColglazierDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Robert LarkDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Elizabeth HubbardDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Robert FrenchDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Denise SmithDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Jikai ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Erin McCrumDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Anthony CatanzanoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Joseph CaoDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Leah WaldmanDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Maciej A MazurowskiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Benjamin Alman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Scoliosis, a prevalent condition characterized by abnormal spinal curvature leading to deformity, requires precise assessment methods for effective diagnosis and management. The Cobb angle is a widely used scoliosis quantification method that measures the degree of curvature between the tilted vertebrae. Yet, manual measuring of Cobb angles is time-consuming and labour-intensive, fraught with significant interobserver and intraobserver variability. To address these challenges and the lack of interpretability found in certain existing automated methods, we have created fully automated software that not only precisely measures the Cobb angle but also provides clear visualizations of these measurements. Methods: This software integrates a deep neural network-based spine region detection and segmentation, spine centreline identification, pinpointing the most significantly tilted vertebrae, and direct visualization of Cobb angles on the original images. Results: Upon comparison with the assessments of 7 expert readers, our algorithm exhibited a mean deviation in Cobb angle measurements of 4.17 degrees, notably surpassing the manual approach's average intra-reader discrepancy of 5.16 degrees. The algorithm also achieved intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) exceeding 0.96 and Pearson correlation coefficients above 0.944, reflecting robust agreement with expert assessments and superior measurement reliability. Conclusions: Through the comprehensive reader study and statistical analysis, we believe this algorithm not only ensures a higher consensus with expert readers but also enhances interpretability and reproducibility during assessments. It holds significant promise for clinical application, potentially helping physicians assess and diagnose scoliosis more accurately, thus improving patient care. Advances in knowledge: A fully automated Cobb angle measurement algorithm was compared with a comprehensive multi-expert study and demonstrated superior performance relative to human observers. The code is publicly available at GitHub.

Indexed as

Cobb angle measurementdeep learningmulti-reader studyscoliosis

Identifiers

PMID42064002
PMCPMC13045704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.