ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2025
Deep learning automates Cobb angle measurement compared with multi-expert observers.
Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in lumbar radiography: bridging deep learning and clinical practice in low-resource environments.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Review
- Identifying scoliosis in a population-based adult cohort: automation of a validated method based on total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Evaluation of AI Performance in Spinal Radiographic Measurements Compared to Radiologists: A Study of Accuracy and Efficiency.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- An end-to-end pipeline for automated scoliosis diagnosis with standardized clinical reporting using SNOMED CT.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Convolutional Neural Network-Based Approach for Cobb Angle Measurement Using Mask R-CNN.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Scoliosis, a prevalent condition characterized by abnormal spinal curvature leading to deformity, requires precise assessment methods for effective diagnosis and management. The Cobb angle is a widely used scoliosis quantification method that measures the degree of curvature between the tilted vertebrae. Yet, manual measuring of Cobb angles is time-consuming and labour-intensive, fraught with significant interobserver and intraobserver variability. To address these challenges and the lack of interpretability found in certain existing automated methods, we have created fully automated software that not only precisely measures the Cobb angle but also provides clear visualizations of these measurements. Methods: This software integrates a deep neural network-based spine region detection and segmentation, spine centreline identification, pinpointing the most significantly tilted vertebrae, and direct visualization of Cobb angles on the original images. Results: Upon comparison with the assessments of 7 expert readers, our algorithm exhibited a mean deviation in Cobb angle measurements of 4.17 degrees, notably surpassing the manual approach's average intra-reader discrepancy of 5.16 degrees. The algorithm also achieved intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) exceeding 0.96 and Pearson correlation coefficients above 0.944, reflecting robust agreement with expert assessments and superior measurement reliability. Conclusions: Through the comprehensive reader study and statistical analysis, we believe this algorithm not only ensures a higher consensus with expert readers but also enhances interpretability and reproducibility during assessments. It holds significant promise for clinical application, potentially helping physicians assess and diagnose scoliosis more accurately, thus improving patient care. Advances in knowledge: A fully automated Cobb angle measurement algorithm was compared with a comprehensive multi-expert study and demonstrated superior performance relative to human observers. The code is publicly available at GitHub.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.