ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2025
An in-silico simulation study to generate computed tomography images from ultrasound data by using deep learning techniques.
Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-time AI-guided ultrasound localization method for breast tumor rotational resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Ultrasound has low sensitivity in parenchymal lesion detection compared to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). In this proof-of-concept-study, we investigate whether raw ultrasound data can be used to generate CT-like images using deep learning models in order to enhance lesion detection. Methods: The k-wave ultrasound and Astra CT simulation toolkits were used to generate 2 datasets (1000 samples each) from simulated phantoms with up to 3 inclusions. The pix2pix conditional Generative adversarial network (cGAN) was trained on 800 samples per dataset, reserving the remainder for testing. Outputs were evaluated using generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM). Segmentation of B-mode alone versus B-mode with model-generated CT overlay was performed by 2 radiologists (1 board-certified and 1 resident) and both their performance and inter-observer agreement were evaluated using the Jaccard Index. Results: Model-generated CT-like images exhibited significantly improved gCNR ( Conclusions: Deep learning models can effectively translate ultrasound data into CT-like images, improving quality and inter-observer agreement, and enhancing lesion detectability, for example, by alleviating shadowing artefacts. Advances in knowledge: Generating CT-like images using raw ultrasound RF data as input to a cGAN model results in a significant improvement in lesion detectability by, for example, alleviating acoustic shadowing. With a cGAN architecture, even relatively small datasets can successfully generate CT-like images that improve lesion detectability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.