Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42064001›Full record

ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2025

An in-silico simulation study to generate computed tomography images from ultrasound data by using deep learning techniques.

Anatol A Aicher, Davide Cester, Alexander Martin, Karolina Pawlus, Florian A Huber, Thomas Frauenfelder, Catherine Paverd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anatol A AicherInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5554-086X
Davide CesterInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-6127
Alexander MartinInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Karolina PawlusInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Florian A HuberInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Thomas FrauenfelderInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-6619
Catherine PaverdInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7288-877X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Ultrasound has low sensitivity in parenchymal lesion detection compared to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). In this proof-of-concept-study, we investigate whether raw ultrasound data can be used to generate CT-like images using deep learning models in order to enhance lesion detection. Methods: The k-wave ultrasound and Astra CT simulation toolkits were used to generate 2 datasets (1000 samples each) from simulated phantoms with up to 3 inclusions. The pix2pix conditional Generative adversarial network (cGAN) was trained on 800 samples per dataset, reserving the remainder for testing. Outputs were evaluated using generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM). Segmentation of B-mode alone versus B-mode with model-generated CT overlay was performed by 2 radiologists (1 board-certified and 1 resident) and both their performance and inter-observer agreement were evaluated using the Jaccard Index. Results: Model-generated CT-like images exhibited significantly improved gCNR ( Conclusions: Deep learning models can effectively translate ultrasound data into CT-like images, improving quality and inter-observer agreement, and enhancing lesion detectability, for example, by alleviating shadowing artefacts. Advances in knowledge: Generating CT-like images using raw ultrasound RF data as input to a cGAN model results in a significant improvement in lesion detectability by, for example, alleviating acoustic shadowing. With a cGAN architecture, even relatively small datasets can successfully generate CT-like images that improve lesion detectability.

Indexed as

augmentationcGANconversionCTdeep learningenhancementpix2pixultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42064001
PMCPMC13045719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.