Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063999›Full record

ReviewBJR artificial intelligence2025

Multimodal artificial intelligence models for radiology.

Amara Tariq, Imon Banerjee, Hari Trivedi, Judy Gichoya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amara TariqMayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, United States.
Imon BanerjeeMayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-8004
Hari TrivediDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
Judy GichoyaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-316X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) models in medicine often fall short in real-world deployment due to inability to incorporate multiple data modalities in their decision-making process as clinicians do. Clinicians integrate evidence and signals from multiple data sources like radiology images, patient clinical status as recorded in electronic health records, consultations from fellow providers, and even subtle clues using the appearance of a patient, when making decisions about diagnosis or treatment. To bridge this gap, significant research effort has focused on building fusion models capable of harnessing multi-modal data for advanced decision making. We present a broad overview of the landscape of research in multimodal AI for radiology covering a wide variety of approaches from traditional fusion modelling to modern vision-language models. We provide analysis of comparative merits and drawbacks of each approach to assist future research and highlight ethical consideration in developing multimodal AI. In practice, the quality and quantity of available training data, availability of computational resources, and clinical application dictates which fusion method may be most suitable.

Indexed as

AI in radiologymultimodal AIvision-language models for radiology

Identifiers

PMID42063999
PMCPMC13045713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.