Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026
The COMEBACK Study: Social Determinants of Health Impact on Virologic Suppression in a 48-Week Low-Barrier-Care Study of Rapid Antiretroviral Therapy Reinitiation Among Persons With HIV Lost to Care.
Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effectively preventing transmission is critical to ending the HIV epidemic (EHE). The primary objective of the COMEBACK study, a 48-week single-center study, was to reengage lost-to-care persons with HIV and rapidly reinitiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alefenamide (B/F/TAF) in a low-barrier-care model to promote virologic suppression (VS). Methods: Adults off ART for ≥2 weeks, without significant B/F/TAF resistance or renal impairment, were started on B/F/TAF upon reengagement after same-day baseline labs (n = 100). Participants self-screened into case management (CM) tiers: minimal, moderate, or advanced. Participants requiring additional support (tier escalation) were identified during the study. The associations of baseline characteristics and 5 social determinants of health (SDoH) assessments with VS status at study end were analyzed. Results: At baseline, the median age was 37 years, with 90% Black and 68% cisgender male. Median CD4+ was 310 cells/mm Conclusions: VS was high for participants with rapid ART reinitiation retained in care. CM escalation and baseline adherence concerns were associated with non-VS at study end. Achieving VS among high-risk populations disenfranchised from care will likely require further innovation in intense individualized CM and retention approaches to capitalize on low-barrier-care models toward EHE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.